# | Map Code | Demographic | Legend Title | Description | Legend Type | |
1 | DST or DGT | Median Household Income 2000 | Median Household Income in Dollars by Census Tract | Median Household Income in 2000 Dollars | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
2 | DSC or DGC | Poverty Population 2000 | Number of Persons in Poverty by County | 100% Poverty Population for the year 2000. | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
3 | DSC or DGC | Percent Change in Poverty Population 1990-2000 | Percent Change in Poverty Population by County | Percent Change in 100% Poverty Population from 1990 to 2000 by County | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
4 | DSC or DGC | Percent of Persons in Poverty | Percent of Total Population in Poverty by County | Percent of County Population that is in Poverty | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
5 | DST or DGT | Density of 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Number of 125% Poverty Population per Square Mile by Census Tract | Density of 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Tract | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
6 | DST or DGT | 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Distribution of '125% Poverty Population by Census Tract | Dot Density Map - 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Tract | Dot Density | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
7 | DST or DGT | Change in 125% Poverty Population 1990-2000 | Change in 125% Poverty Population by County/Tract | Change in 125% Poverty Population 1990-2000 by County/Tract | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Closed Cases | | | | |
8 | CSP | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 | Closed Cases by Location | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location | Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
9 | CGT | Density of Closed Cases | Number of Closed Cases per Square Mile by Census Tract; | Density of Closed Cases 2003 by Tract | Choropleth Determined/ Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
10 | CGT | Change in Closed Cases 2003 Compared to 2002 | Change in Closed Cases by Census Tract | Change in Closed Cases 2003 Compared to 2002 by Tract | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
11 | SGT | Distribution of Total Activity or Matters 2002 (CSR Cases/Non CSR//Matters - See Cal-LASOC) | Activity by Location | Distribution of Services 2003 by Location | Dot Map/Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
12 | CGP | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 Legal Category - Family or Housing or DMV or health…. | Closed Cases by Location | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location | Dot Map/Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
13 | CGP | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Service Provided - Brief Service & Counsel and Advice | Closed Cases by Location | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location | Dot Map/Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
14 | CGZ | Percentage of Cases Closed with Extended Service - 2003 | Percentage of Cases Closed with Extended Service - 2003 by ZIP Code | Percentage of Cases Closed with Extended Service - 2003 by ZIP Code | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
15 | CGP | Distribution of Funding source (OAA, VAWA, Many) Closed Cases 2003 | Closed Cases by Location | Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location | Dot Map/Point Location | |
| | | | | Overlay | |
| | | | | | |
| | Access | | | | |
16 | AGP | Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Closed Cases by Location, Number of 125% Poverty Population per Square Mile by Census Tract | Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - by Tract; Closed Cases by Location | Choropleth Determined/ Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
17 | ASR | Ratio of Closed Cases 2002 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by Service Area | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Regional Office | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
18 | AGC | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by County | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by County | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
19 | AGT | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by Census Tract, Closed Cases by Location | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Tract | Choropleth Determined | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
20 | SGP | Cases Closed - Actual vs Predicted 2003 | Standard Deviations Above or Below Predicted by Census Tract - OIG processed data | Using poverty distribution at 125 % as predictor of number of cases closed show the calculated variation from the mean (shows relative underserved) | Special Choropleth | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
21 | ALP | Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - (Zoom -ins) | Closed Cases by Location, Number of 125% Poverty Population per Square Mile by Census Block Group | Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Block Group; Closed Cases by Location | Choropleth Determined/ Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
22 | ALG | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - Yellowstone County/Billings (Zoom-ins) | Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by Census Block Group, Closed Cases by Location | Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - by Block Group; Point Locations by Brief Service, Extended Service | Choropleth Determined/ Point Location | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Special | | | | |
23 | CGZ | Distribution of Private Attorneys 2004 (see Cal, Montana uses PAI Closed Cases 2003) | Closed Cases by Location and Number of Attorneys by Zip Code | PAI cased overlay over attorney by Zip Choropleth | Dot Map/Point Location over Special Colorpleth | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
24 | AGT | Distribution of Hotline Closed Cases 2002 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 | Closed Cases by Location; Number of Persons per Square Mile by Census Tract | Hotline Closed Cases over density of poverty population (125%) | Dot Map/Point Location over Colorpleth | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
25 | DGT | Non-English Speaking Persons 2000 | Number of Persons by Census Tract | Distribution (Dots) of Households where the Primary Language spoken in the home is not English by Census Tract. | Dot density map with a different color dot for each language | |
26 | AGT | Distribution of Target Population Closed Cases 2002 to Target Population 100% Poverty Population 2000 (Hispanic, Black, White, Asian, Seniors, Female Head of Households) | Closed Cases by Location; Number of Persons per Square Mile by Census Tract | Number of Target Persons in poverty per Square Mile by Census Tract with dots of Target Closed Cases | Density - Choropleth (Target pov pop) with point overlay of cases | |